Burn Mcp Server vs Stacksfinder Mcp

In-depth architectural comparison of the Burn Mcp Server and Stacksfinder Mcp MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

B

Choose Burn Mcp Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: search_vault, list_vault, list_sparks.

Explore Burn Mcp Server Details

Choose Stacksfinder Mcp when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_technologies, analyze_tech, compare_techs.

Explore Stacksfinder Mcp Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	B Burn Mcp Server Security	Stacksfinder Mcp hoklims Security
Summary	22 tools to let your AI agent search, triage, and organize your reading list.	Deterministic tech stack recommendations with 6-dimension scoring. Analyze, compare technologies, get optimal stack suggestions for any project type. 10 tools (4 free, 6 Pro).
Category & Scope	Security	Security

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "burn-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "burn-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "hoklims-stacksfinder-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@stacksfinder/mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons