Burn MCP Server vs Binary Ninja MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Burn MCP Server and Binary Ninja MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Burn MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Freemium).
• Primary tools included: search_vault, list_vault, list_sparks.

Explore Burn MCP Server Details

Choose Binary Ninja MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Paid Service).
• Primary tools included: list_methods, get_entry_points, search_functions_by_name.

Explore Binary Ninja MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Burn MCP Server Security	Binary Ninja MCP fosdickio Security
Summary	22 tools to let your AI agent search, triage, and organize your reading list.	A Binary Ninja plugin, MCP server, and bridge that seamlessly integrates Binary Ninja with your favorite MCP client. It enables you to automate the process of performing binary analysis and reverse engineering.
Category & Scope	Security

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "burn-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "burn-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "fosdickio-binary-ninja-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "binary-ninja-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons