Bundlephobia vs Jshookmcp

In-depth architectural comparison of the Bundlephobia and Jshookmcp MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

B

Choose Bundlephobia when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: package.

Explore Bundlephobia Details

Choose Jshookmcp when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Jshookmcp Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	B Bundlephobia Developer Tools	Jshookmcp Developer Tools
Summary	Bundlephobia MCP — npm bundle-size analysis	MCP server for JavaScript analysis, security auditing, browser automation and hooks
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "bundlephobia": {
      "url": "https://pipeworx.io"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "jshookmcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@jshookmcp/jshook@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons