What is the key difference between Builderforce and Zyphe?

Builderforce belongs to the Developer Tools category with local stdio execution, while Zyphe belongs to the Developer Tools category with cloud HTTP/SSE execution.

How do I install Builderforce or Zyphe in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Builderforce and Zyphe free or paid?

Builderforce operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Zyphe operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Builderforce lists 0 tools with 1 views and 5 GitHub stars. Zyphe lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Builderforce and Zyphe together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Builderforce vs Zyphe

In-depth architectural comparison of the Builderforce and Zyphe MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Builderforce

Developer Tools · Local stdio

Quality: 40/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Zyphe

Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE

Quality: 42/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Builderforce if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Zyphe if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Builderforce when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Builderforce Details

Choose Zyphe when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Zyphe Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Builderforce Developer Tools	Z Zyphe Developer Tools
Summary	Run tickets, boards, OKRs and cloud coding agents in your Builderforce workspace	Run KYB and AML case reviews and configure Zyphe verification flows, forms and API keys.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Builderforce Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Zyphe Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Builderforce Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "builderforce": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "wrangler"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Zyphe Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "zyphe": {
      "url": "https://docs.zyphe.com/docs/guides/model-context-protocol-mcp"
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Builderforce is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Zyphe belongs to Developer Tools using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select Builderforce when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Zyphe when you require tools for developer tools.

More alternatives to Builderforce More alternatives to Zyphe Developer Tools category hub