Builderforce vs Google Workspace Admin Security Audit MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Builderforce and Google Workspace Admin Security Audit MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Builderforce when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Builderforce Details

Choose Google Workspace Admin Security Audit MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Google Workspace Admin Security Audit MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Builderforce Developer Tools	Google Workspace Admin Security Audit MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Run tickets, boards, OKRs and cloud coding agents in your Builderforce workspace	MCP server for Google Workspace security auditing — login audit, external sharing, daily brief
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "builderforce": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "wrangler"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "google-workspace-admin-security-audit-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "gwsadm-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons