A side-by-side look at the Browser Gateway and Chrome Bridge MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose Browser Gateway for browser automation work as a local process; choose Chrome Bridge for browser automation as a local process. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
Choose Browser Gateway when
You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Chrome Bridge tools
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
Browser Gateway is categorized under Browser Automation and uses a local stdio subprocess. Chrome Bridge belongs to Browser Automation and uses a local stdio subprocess. Pick Browser Gateway for browser automation work and Chrome Bridge for browser automation.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.
Browser Gateway has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. Chrome Bridge has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add browser-gateway and chrome-bridge as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, Browser Gateway has a quality signal of 43/100 (Fair) with 0 views, 0 installs and 18 GitHub stars. Chrome Bridge has 47/100 (Fair) with 0 views, 0 installs and 5 GitHub stars.