Boxberry MCP vs Yango Delivery MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Boxberry MCP and Yango Delivery MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

B

Choose Boxberry MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Boxberry MCP Details

Choose Yango Delivery MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Yango Delivery MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	B Boxberry MCP Developer Tools	Yango Delivery MCP Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server for Boxberry delivery API — city/point search, delivery calculation, tracking. 4 tools.	MCP server for the Yango Delivery claims B2B API: price checks, delivery claims, courier tracking.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "boxberry-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@theyahia/boxberry-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "yango-delivery-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-yango-delivery@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons