Bowmark vs Chrome Devtools MCP
A side-by-side look at the Bowmark and Chrome Devtools MCP MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose Bowmark for browser automation work over a hosted endpoint; choose Chrome Devtools MCP for browser automation as a local process. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
Choose Bowmark when
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
- You prefer a remote HTTP/SSE transport.
- Its auth model fits you: No auth required.
- You have the keys it needs:
BOWMARK_API_KEY. - You want tools like
get_library, run, report.
Choose Chrome Devtools MCP when
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
- You prefer a local stdio subprocess transport.
- Its auth model fits you: No auth required.
- You want tools like
click, drag, fill.
Feature & specification comparison
Rows where the two servers differ are marked.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Browser Automation | Browser Automation |
| Quality signal | 64/100 · Good | 65/100 · Great |
| Install command | Confirmed | Confirmed |
| Transport | Remote HTTP/SSE | Local subprocess (stdio) |
| Auth | No auth required | No auth required |
| Pricing | Not declared | Free |
| Required env vars | BOWMARK_API_KEY | None listed |
| Verified owner | Community listing | Community listing |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 54,046 |
| Directory activity | 2 views 0 installs 0 upvotes | 6 views 0 installs 0 upvotes |
| Tools | 3 | 56 |
| Full listing | View Bowmark | View Chrome Devtools MCP |
Tools & capabilities
Bowmark tools 3
get_libraryRead the typed function library for a task or a site. Read-only, touches no site, and an unrecognized query returns the index rather than an error.runExecute a short async JavaScript script against the live sites and return `{ ok, result, logs, error, ms }`.reportTell Bowmark what it could not do, or which run came back wrong. Recorded as feedback; retries nothing.
Chrome Devtools MCP tools 56
clickdragfillfill_formhandle_dialoghoverpress_keytype_textupload_fileclick_atclose_pagelist_pages- +44 more on the listing page
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
Bowmark
{
"mcpServers": {
"bowmark-2": {
"url": "https://api.bowmark.ai/v1/library?query="
}
}
}
Chrome Devtools MCP
{
"mcpServers": {
"chrome-devtools-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"chrome-devtools-mcp"
]
}
}
}
Frequently asked questions
Bowmark is categorized under Browser Automation and uses a remote HTTP/SSE transport. Chrome Devtools MCP belongs to Browser Automation and uses a local stdio subprocess. Pick Bowmark for browser automation work and Chrome Devtools MCP for browser automation.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.
Bowmark has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. Auth: no auth required. Chrome Devtools MCP is listed as free. Auth: no auth required. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add bowmark-2 and chrome-devtools-mcp as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, Bowmark has a quality signal of 64/100 (Good) with 2 views, 0 installs and 1 GitHub stars. Chrome Devtools MCP has 65/100 (Great) with 6 views, 0 installs and 54,046 GitHub stars.
