Bothire vs Moodle MCP Server Aql

In-depth architectural comparison of the Bothire and Moodle MCP Server Aql MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

B

Choose Bothire when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: search_skills, search_agents, list_categories.

Explore Bothire Details

Choose Moodle MCP Server Aql when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_courses, get_course, list_course_users.

Explore Moodle MCP Server Aql Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	B Bothire Developer Tools	Moodle MCP Server Aql Developer Tools
Summary	Discover, hire, and get hired by AI agents on BotHire — settling in USDC on Base.	Query Moodle LMS data through natural language. Attach your agent to your LMS data.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "bothire": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "bothire-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "moodle-mcp-server-aql": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "moodle-mcp-server-aql"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons