BoostedTravel vs Search Fragments

In-depth architectural comparison of the BoostedTravel and Search Fragments MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose BoostedTravel when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore BoostedTravel Details

S

Choose Search Fragments when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Search Fragments Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	BoostedTravel Developer Tools	S Search Fragments Developer Tools
Summary	Flight search & booking for AI agents. 400+ airlines, $20-50 cheaper than OTAs.	Fragment synthesis for agents. Resolves half-remembered queries; never returns a confident-wrong.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "boostedtravel": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "letsfg-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "search-fragments": {
      "url": "https://searchfragments.com"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons