BoondManager MCP Server vs Odds Api

In-depth architectural comparison of the BoondManager MCP Server and Odds Api MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose BoondManager MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore BoondManager MCP Server Details

Choose Odds Api when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Odds Api Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	BoondManager MCP Server Developer Tools	Odds Api Developer Tools
Summary	MCP Server for BoondManager API - 158 tools across 36 domains for ERP/CRM data	The Odds API MCP — sportsbook odds across 70+ books, 30+ leagues
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "boondmanager-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "boondmanager-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "odds-api-2": {
      "url": "https://pipeworx.io"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons