Motionlint vs Figwright

Side-by-side comparison of two Model Context Protocol servers — install paths, tools, quality signals, and directory engagement so you can pick the right one for Claude, Cursor, and other MCP clients.

Compare
Motionlint logo
Motionlint
bobaba99
📐 Architecture & Design
Figwright logo
Figwright
awdr74100
📐 Architecture & Design
SummaryCatch bad animations before they ship. 13 deterministic checks on the live page (duration, easing, stagger, exits, reduced-motion, touch-gated hover) with no API key or LLM, plus optional vision-LLM UX review across viewports. Install via NPM: npx -y motionlint mcpBidirectional Figma server over a local WebSocket relay: turn a selection into framework-aware code (reusing your components and tokens), or author frames, text, styles, variables, and whole screens back onto the canvas. 92 tools, any MCP client, no Dev Mode seat or paid tier.
Quality signal41/100 (Fair)52/100 (Fair)
Install pathnpx · highnpx · high
Engagement 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 435
ToolsNot listed yetLocal WebSocket relay connecting MCP clients to a Figma pluginBidirectional design-code synchronization with 92+ tools for reading and writingProvider-first code generation detecting real framework and styling systemSupports multiple MCP clients with leader election and session resumeOpen source with extensible installable skillsNo Figma Dev Mode seat or paid tier required
Verified / officialNoNo
Open listingView MotionlintView Figwright
More alternatives to MotionlintMore alternatives to FigwrightArchitecture & Design categoryCanonical compare URL

Other servers like Motionlint