Agent47 vs World Monitor

In-depth architectural comparison of the Agent47 and World Monitor MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Agent47 when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Budget, loop, fuzzy-loop, retry, timeout, and rate-limit guards, Task-level budgets with warning hooks, OpenAI and Anthropic provider patches.

Explore Agent47 Details

Choose World Monitor when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: other (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: 39 global intelligence tools, Curated global and regional news, Country Instability Index data.

Explore World Monitor Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Agent47 bmdhodl Monitoring	World Monitor Monitoring
Summary	Runtime guardrails and incident read access for coding agents. Query AgentGuard traces, alerts, usage, costs, and budget health.	Live global intelligence: real-time markets, conflicts, country risk, chokepoints, energy. 39 tools.
Category & Scope	Monitoring	Monitoring

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "bmdhodl-agent47": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@agentguard47/mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "world-monitor": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "worldmonitor"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons