Agent47 vs Metoro MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Agent47 and Metoro MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Agent47 when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Read hosted traces and decision history, Query alerts, usage, costs, and budget health, Expose local budget tools through MCP.

Explore Agent47 Details

Choose Metoro MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: API Key required (BYOK (Pay Provider Direct)).
• You have access to required keys: METORO_AUTH_TOKEN, METORO_API_URL.
• Primary tools included: Access Metoro eBPF-based telemetry APIs, Supports Kubernetes cluster observability queries, Integrates with Claude Desktop App via MCP.

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Agent47 bmdhodl Monitoring	Metoro MCP Server metoro-io Monitoring
Summary
Category & Scope	Monitoring	Monitoring
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "bmdhodl-agent47": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "agentguard47"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "metoro-io-metoro-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "metoro-io-metoro-mcp-server"
      ],
      "env": {
        "METORO_AUTH_TOKEN": "YOUR_METORO_AUTH_TOKEN_HERE",
        "METORO_API_URL": "YOUR_METORO_API_URL_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons