Agent47 vs Ig MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Agent47 and Ig MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Agent47 when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Read hosted traces and decision history, Query alerts, usage, costs, and budget health, Expose local budget tools through MCP.

Explore Agent47 Details

Choose Ig MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: ig_deploy, ig_gadgets.

Explore Ig MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Agent47 bmdhodl Monitoring	Ig MCP Server inspektor-gadget Monitoring
Summary	Runtime guardrails and incident read access for coding agents. Query AgentGuard traces, alerts, usage, costs, and budget health.	Debug your Container and Kubernetes workloads with an AI interface powered by eBPF.
Category & Scope	Monitoring

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "bmdhodl-agent47": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "agentguard47"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "inspektor-gadget-ig-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "inspektor-gadget-ig-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons