MCP Graphql vs Deckodex

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Graphql and Deckodex MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MCP Graphql when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: introspect-schema, query-graphql.

Explore MCP Graphql Details

Choose Deckodex when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Gaming domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Deckodex Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	MCP Graphql blurrah Developer Tools	Deckodex Gaming
Summary	Model Context Protocol server for GraphQL	Gundam Card Game cards, prices, tournament meta, and your Deckodex collection and decks.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Gaming
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "blurrah-mcp-graphql": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-graphql"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "deckodex-2": {
      "url": "https://deckodex.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons