Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Bls vs Mlb Stats
In-depth architectural comparison of the Bls and Mlb Stats MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Bls
Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 39/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Mlb Stats
Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 37/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Bls if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Mlb Stats if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
B
Choose Bls when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
M
Choose Mlb Stats when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Bls Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Mlb Stats Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Bls Configuration
Mlb Stats Configuration