In-depth architectural comparison of the BlendDuck Social Publishing and Bulkpublish MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
BlendDuck Social Publishing
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 20/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Bulkpublish
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose BlendDuck Social Publishing if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Bulkpublish if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
B
Choose BlendDuck Social Publishing when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
BlendDuck Social Publishing is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Bulkpublish belongs to Developer Tools using local stdio subprocess. Select BlendDuck Social Publishing when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Bulkpublish when you require tools for developer tools.