BLEA vs Chinese Astrology MCP Server by RoxyAPI

In-depth architectural comparison of the BLEA and Chinese Astrology MCP Server by RoxyAPI MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose BLEA when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore BLEA Details

C

Choose Chinese Astrology MCP Server by RoxyAPI when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Chinese Astrology MCP Server by RoxyAPI Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	BLEA Developer Tools	C Chinese Astrology MCP Server by RoxyAPI Developer Tools
Summary	Safe BLE diagnostics, evidence workflows, and guarded automation for AI agents.	BaZi four pillars, Chinese zodiac, lunisolar calendar and almanac days for AI agents.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "blea": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "chinese-astrology-mcp-server-by-roxyapi": {
      "url": "https://roxyapi.com/products/chinese-astrology-api"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons