What is the key difference between Blazingcdn MCP and Churnkey?

Blazingcdn MCP belongs to the Monitoring category with local stdio execution, while Churnkey belongs to the Monitoring category with cloud HTTP/SSE execution.

How do I install Blazingcdn MCP or Churnkey in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Blazingcdn MCP and Churnkey free or paid?

Blazingcdn MCP operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Churnkey operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Blazingcdn MCP lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars. Churnkey lists 0 tools with 0 views and 21 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Blazingcdn MCP and Churnkey together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Blazingcdn MCP vs Churnkey

In-depth architectural comparison of the Blazingcdn MCP and Churnkey MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Blazingcdn MCP

Monitoring · Local stdio

Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Churnkey

Monitoring · Remote HTTP/SSE

Quality: 41/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Blazingcdn MCP if you need specialized Monitoring tools running via a local process. Choose Churnkey if your workspace requires Monitoring integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Blazingcdn MCP when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Blazingcdn MCP Details

Choose Churnkey when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Churnkey Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	B Blazingcdn MCP Monitoring	C Churnkey Monitoring
Summary	Manage BlazingCDN from AI agents: CDN zones, cache, metrics, domains, cloud storage and video CDN	Read and manage Churnkey cancel flows, retention metrics, and payment recovery
Category & Scope	Monitoring	Monitoring
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Blazingcdn MCP Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Churnkey Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Blazingcdn MCP Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "blazingcdn-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "blazingcdn-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Churnkey Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "churnkey": {
      "url": "https://churnkey.co"
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Blazingcdn MCP is categorized under Monitoring and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Churnkey belongs to Monitoring using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select Blazingcdn MCP when you need capabilities focused on monitoring and Churnkey when you require tools for monitoring.

More alternatives to Blazingcdn MCP More alternatives to Churnkey Monitoring category hub