Blank Files MCP vs Puter MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Blank Files MCP and Puter MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Blank Files MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Blank Files MCP Details

Choose Puter MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Puter MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Blank Files MCP Developer Tools	Puter MCP Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server for listing and retrieving minimal valid blank files from blankfiles.com.	Puter MCP enables AI tools to interact with Puter: manage files, websites, workers, and more
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "blank-files-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "blank-files-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-server-43": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-server-43"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons