Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Bitrix24 MCP vs Cue
In-depth architectural comparison of the Bitrix24 MCP and Cue MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Bitrix24 MCP
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 39/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Cue
Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 30/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Bitrix24 MCP if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Cue if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
B
Choose Bitrix24 MCP when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
C
Choose Cue when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Bitrix24 MCP Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Cue Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Bitrix24 MCP Configuration
Cue Configuration