Bitget Agent MCP vs Opendock

In-depth architectural comparison of the Bitget Agent MCP and Opendock MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

B

Choose Bitget Agent MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Bitget Agent MCP Details

Choose Opendock when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Opendock Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	B Bitget Agent MCP Developer Tools	Opendock Developer Tools
Summary	Official Bitget MCP Server for the Unified Trading Account (UTA v3) API.	MCP server for the Opendock dock scheduling and warehouse management API.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "bitget-agent-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "bitget-agent-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "opendock": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "opendock-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons