Billy MCP vs Buchpilot

In-depth architectural comparison of the Billy MCP and Buchpilot MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Billy MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: appliedFilters, idempotencyKey, execute_script.

Explore Billy MCP Details

Choose Buchpilot when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Buchpilot Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Billy MCP Finance & Fintech	Buchpilot Finance & Fintech
Summary	Billy (billy.dk) accounting: invoices, journal entries, trial balance, with write protection.	DACH accounting for AI: connect sevDesk & Lexoffice to create invoices, contacts, vouchers.
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "billy-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "billy-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "buchpilot": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "buchpilot-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons