Bidda Compliance vs LienDeadline
A side-by-side look at the Bidda Compliance and LienDeadline MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose Bidda Compliance for legal work; choose LienDeadline for legal. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
Choose Bidda Compliance when
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
- You want tools like
list_pillars, search_nodes, get_node.
Choose LienDeadline when
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
- You want tools like
calculate_supplier_deadlines, get_supplier_questions, calculate_supplier_deadlines_v3.
Feature & specification comparison
Rows where the two servers differ are marked.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Legal | Legal |
| Quality signal | 52/100 · Good | 57/100 · Good |
| Install command | Not confirmed yet | Not confirmed yet |
| Transport | — | — |
| Auth | Not declared | Not declared |
| Pricing | Freemium | Not declared |
| Required env vars | None listed | None listed |
| Verified owner | Community listing | Community listing |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 1 |
| Directory activity | 0 views 0 installs 0 upvotes | 1 views 0 installs 0 upvotes |
| Tools | 25 | 7 |
| Full listing | View Bidda Compliance | View LienDeadline |
Tools & capabilities
Bidda Compliance tools 25
list_pillarsList all compliance pillars in the Bidda Sovereign Intelligence registry with node counts. Use this first to discover available compliance domains before searching. Bidda has 10,131 cryptographically-verified nodes across 39 pillars, including a MITRE layer spanning 6 frameworks (ATT&CK Enterprise/Mobile/ICS, D3FEND, ATLAS, CAPEC) plus Banking, AI Governance, Cybersecurity, Healthcare, Legal, ESG and more.search_nodesSearch Bidda compliance nodes by keyword. Returns matching node summaries including a one-sentence BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front): the exact compliance obligation in plain language. Every node traces to a primary legal source (no hallucination). Examples: "Basel III capital", "GDPR data breach", "AML transaction monitoring", "SOC 2 Type II".get_nodeGet a specific compliance node by its ID. Returns the node summary: title, compliance pillar, version, last updated, and BLUF. The full node (machine-executable deterministic workflow, actionable schema, primary legal citations, dependency chain) is available at bidda.com.get_dependency_chainWalk the prerequisite chain for a compliance node. Given one node, returns its full dependency tree (the prior obligations an agent must satisfy before this one applies). Use this to plan a complete compliance posture: unlocking one node usually requires understanding 3-8 upstream nodes. Defaults to depth 2; max 4.get_crosswalkReturn the cross-framework mapping dimensions for a node: which other regulations, standards, or jurisdictions this rule maps to (e.g. GDPR Article 17 → CCPA right-to-delete → POPIA Section 24). Discovery returns the available dimensions; full mapping values are vault-gated.get_latest_changesList the most recently updated compliance nodes: the regulatory change feed. Use to monitor incoming amendments, new guidance, or freshly added rules. Filter by pillar to focus on a domain. Agents should call this on a schedule to keep compliance posture current.get_jurisdiction_bundleReturn all compliance nodes that apply in a specific jurisdiction (EU, US, UK, Australia, Singapore, India, Canada, China, South Africa, Japan, Brazil and others). Use when an agent enters a new market and needs the full regulatory surface for that geography.get_mitre_mappingThe MITRE Rosetta Stone. Given a MITRE technique ID across 5 frameworks (ATT&CK Enterprise, ATT&CK Mobile, ATT&CK ICS, D3FEND, ATLAS), return the Bidda node for that technique plus its mapped compliance obligations: NIST 800-53 controls, ISO 27001 Annex A clauses, PCI DSS requirements, NIS2 articles, HIPAA Security Rule, DORA articles, NERC CIP, IEC 62443. The bridge between how SOC teams think (technique IDs) and how compliance teams think (control families). Free.check_action_compliancePre-flight regulatory check. Agent describes an intended action in natural language ("process EU resident biometric data", "transfer health records to a third-party AI vendor", "deploy autonomous trading model in Singapore") and receives a ranked list of regulations that may apply, plus a risk indicator (LOW/MODERATE/HIGH). The primary tool for runtime compliance gating in autonomous agent workflows.browse_topicsBrowse the registry by cross-cutting compliance TOPIC (for example data breach notification, AI transparency, AML and KYC). Returns each topic with how many rules carry it and across how many pillars and jurisdictions. Topics sit on top of the 39 pillars without replacing them. Free, no key required. Pass a topic string to drill into one.compare_jurisdictionsCompare how different jurisdictions address a compliance topic, side by side, including where their numeric thresholds differ (for example a breach-notification deadline of 72 hours versus 30 days). It surfaces the real rules and numbers and does not rank which jurisdiction is stricter. Requires an active Bidda subscription: pass your key as api_key.create_attestationCreate a signed, time-stamped record of which Bidda rules a person or AI agent relied on for a decision. Returns a record ID and a public verify URL so anyone can later confirm the record has not been changed. Useful for agents that must keep an audit trail of what they checked. Requires an active Bidda subscription: pass api_key.- +13 more on the listing page
LienDeadline tools 7
calculate_supplier_deadlinesCalculates a construction material supplier's preliminary notice and lien filing deadlines from delivery events (contract supplier-events-v2), for questions that need deadline dates. Available baselines cover Florida and Kansas private projects; other states and public projects return review_required, which is a valid result, not an error. How the parameters depend on each other: last_delivery_date is required when deliveries_complete is true. Florida (FL) takes florida_final_payment_status and florida_termination_status; Kansas (KS) takes kansas_extension_status; these are rejected for other states. Each takes yes, no or unknown: an omitted or unknown answer keeps the affected deadline under review, and a blanket review flag is not accepted. The Florida final-payment answer holds the notice for suppliers not hired by the owner. A Florida event date is accepted only with the matching yes answer. Delivery dates are furnishing dates, not invoice dates. Returns JSON with an overall status (calculated or review_required), preliminary_notice and lien_filing (each with its own status: calculated, not_required, review_required or awaiting_final_delivery, plus deadline, days_from_now, description and statute source_url), critical_warnings, statute_citations, an exact echo of the submitted inputs and a disclaimer. Invalid or contradictory facts return an error naming the field before any API call. Requires a customer key and consumes one plan calculation unit. No project is saved, notice sent or lien filed. Not legal advice.get_supplier_questionsReturns the current supplier-events-v3 scope support, jurisdiction-specific yes/no/unknown event questions, date policies, optional recurring_notice_intake descriptor, sources and exact rule/question identities for a material supplier. Requires a customer key; no delivery dates needed. Discovery does not consume calculation quota. A 503 means the reviewed source is unavailable. Approval of research alone does not activate a scope.calculate_supplier_deadlines_v3Evaluates supplier-events-v3 project facts against the exact discovered rule and question identities. Returns independent notice and lien outcomes with sources and an exact nested input echo. When RI discovery asks ri_mailed_within_200_days after ri_mailed=yes, confirm whether mailing occurred within 200 days of first delivery. No, Unknown or omitted confirmation requires review; recording alone does not establish a 40-day target. Only calculated outcomes contain calculated deadline dates. Report every candidate_deadlines entry with its ID, date and sources under the API explanation. For NH review fallbacks, first_furnishing is a conservative checkpoint and final_furnishing is informational pending contract grouping and qualifying completion; passing the first checkpoint does not itself establish expiry. A calculated contract_completion outcome uses only the returned deadline, without substituting the first checkpoint or recomputing a date. Review candidates do not establish filing deadlines, completion or scheduled reminders. An optional preliminary_notice.notice_duties collection contains independently required named notices, each with its own calculated date, explanation and sources; the legacy preliminary date is only their earliest summary. Report every validated duty without inferring duties from candidates or treating one notice as satisfying all duties. A separate optional preliminary_notice.planned_notice_targets collection contains qualified intent planning targets with their target dates, assumed filing dates, full ten- or thirty-day intervals, explanations and sources. Planning targets do not establish statutory expirations, actual filing, notice completion or scheduled notifications. An optional verified action_by is a Conservative action date planning target under qualified review; the statutory deadline and countdown remain unresolved, with explanation, sources and warnings. Optional recurring_notice_facts supplies actual Tennessee furnished months or New Hampshire account records. Tennessee recurring_notice_periods cover entered periods only, including paid and unknown states; known unpaid duties remain independent. New Hampshire recurring_notice_checkpoints are advisory check-ins with unresolved legal status, not legal deadlines, service, completion or scheduled reminders; they do not reset earlier gaps. Never infer intervening months or blanket completion. Stale identities return 409, unavailable reviewed sources return 503. Requires a customer key and consumes one plan calculation unit. No project is saved, notice sent or lien filed.calculate_lien_deadlineCustomer API tool: requires LIENDEADLINE_API_KEY, a dedicated LienDeadline customer key; without one it returns a configuration error and makes no request. Calculates the preliminary notice and lien filing deadlines for one construction invoice from its invoice or delivery date and state. Returns JSON with state, invoice_date, project_type, preliminary_notice_deadline, lien_deadline, waiver_due_date, prelim_deadline_days, lien_deadline_days, warnings such as weekend or holiday rollover, notes and a disclaimer. A date, day count or project_type the API does not return is null; missing warnings is [] and missing notes is an empty string. API denials (401 key, 403 scope, 429 rate limit) return a tool error. Successful calculations consume one API plan unit. Not legal advice.list_supported_statesCustomer API tool: requires LIENDEADLINE_API_KEY with the states:read scope. Returns count and the two-letter codes of the jurisdictions the customer invoice calculation accepts. It does not list editorial guides or the states with reviewed supplier baselines. Takes no parameters. Read-only.get_state_lien_guideReturns LienDeadline's editorial mechanics lien and preliminary notice guide for one state or DC: rules (rule summary with statute citations), deadline_rows (deadline table), faqs (common questions) and source_url (the guide's web page), roughly 4 KB of JSON. For questions about how a state's lien or notice rules work, why a deadline falls where it does, or which statute applies. An unknown state code returns an error. The guide is an editorial reference, not a calculation: its day counts are summaries, not computed deadlines. Public and read-only; no key needed.list_state_lien_guidesLists every published state lien guide in one response, without pagination: count plus state_code, title and slug for all 50 states and DC, in alphabetical order by state name. It lists editorial guides only and does not indicate which states have calculated deadlines. Takes no parameters. Public and read-only; no key needed.
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
Bidda Compliance
No confirmed install command for Bidda Compliance yet — follow the setup steps linked from its listing page rather than a guessed package name.
LienDeadline
No confirmed install command for LienDeadline yet — follow the setup steps linked from its listing page rather than a guessed package name.
Frequently asked questions
Bidda Compliance is categorized under Legal and uses an install path we have not confirmed yet. LienDeadline belongs to Legal and uses an install path we have not confirmed yet. Pick Bidda Compliance for legal work and LienDeadline for legal.
Neither server has a confirmed install command yet, so we don't publish a guessed config. Follow each project's own setup instructions, linked from its listing page.
Bidda Compliance is listed as freemium — a free tier with paid plans. LienDeadline has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add bidda-compliance and liendeadline as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, Bidda Compliance has a quality signal of 52/100 (Good) with 0 views, 0 installs and 1 GitHub stars. LienDeadline has 57/100 (Good) with 1 views, 0 installs and 1 GitHub stars.