Beaubi 行動美研 vs Exogram Authority Runtime

In-depth architectural comparison of the Beaubi 行動美研 and Exogram Authority Runtime MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

B

Choose Beaubi 行動美研 when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Beaubi 行動美研 Details

Choose Exogram Authority Runtime when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Exogram Authority Runtime Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	B Beaubi 行動美研 Developer Tools	Exogram Authority Runtime Developer Tools
Summary	台灣到府美容服務（美甲、美睫、紋繡、採耳、肌膚管理、推拿；台北、新北、宜蘭、台中）：查服務項目與起跳價、單一服務細節、會員制度、怎麼預約（預約在 Beaubi App 完成）。	Model Context Protocol server for the Exogram Authority Runtime.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "beaubi": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "beaubi"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "exogram-authority-runtime": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/server-memory"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons