Beans MCP vs MCP Server Couchbase

In-depth architectural comparison of the Beans MCP and MCP Server Couchbase MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

B

Choose Beans MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Beans MCP Details

Choose MCP Server Couchbase when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore MCP Server Couchbase Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	B Beans MCP Developer Tools	MCP Server Couchbase Developer Tools
Summary	Interact with the Beans CLI issue tracker agentically	Couchbase Model Context Protocol Server to interact with Couchbase clusters
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "beans-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@selfagency/beans-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-server-couchbase": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "couchbase-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons