知己排盘 BaZi vs Payram Helper MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the 知己排盘 BaZi and Payram Helper MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

知

Choose 知己排盘 BaZi when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore 知己排盘 BaZi Details

Choose Payram Helper MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Payram Helper MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	知 知己排盘 BaZi Developer Tools	Payram Helper MCP Server Developer Tools
Summary	BaZi (Chinese Four Pillars) chart calculator. Structured chart data only, no predictions.	Remote MCP server to integrate and validate self-hosted Payram deployments.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "bazi": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "zhiji-bazi-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "payram-helper-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons