Bawbel Scanner vs Bug Detector

In-depth architectural comparison of the Bawbel Scanner and Bug Detector MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Bawbel Scanner when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Bawbel Scanner Details

Choose Bug Detector when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Bug Detector Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Bawbel Scanner Security	Bug Detector Security
Summary	Security scanner for MCP servers and skill files. Detects AVE vulnerabilities before production.	Analyzes code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code smells
Category & Scope	Security	Security
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "bawbel-scanner-2": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "bawbel-scanner"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "bug-detector": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "bug-detector"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons