Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Base64 vs Tldraw
In-depth architectural comparison of the Base64 and Tldraw MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Base64
Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 53/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Tldraw
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 52/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Base64 if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Tldraw if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
B
Choose Base64 when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
- Primary tools included: base64_encode, base64_decode.
T
Choose Tldraw when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Base64 Tools (2)
base64_encode
Encode UTF-8 text to Base64 / Base64URL / Base32 / Hex (keyless, offline). Set `variant` (default base64).
base64_decode
Decode Base64 / Base64URL / Base32 / Hex back to UTF-8 text (keyless, offline). Set `variant` (default base64).
Tldraw Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Base64 Configuration
Tldraw Configuration