Bardo vs AgentTrust — Identity & Trust for A2A Agents

In-depth architectural comparison of the Bardo and AgentTrust — Identity & Trust for A2A Agents MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

B

Choose Bardo when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Bardo Details

Choose AgentTrust — Identity & Trust for A2A Agents when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore AgentTrust — Identity & Trust for A2A Agents Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	B Bardo Developer Tools	AgentTrust — Identity & Trust for A2A Agents Developer Tools
Summary	Identity & continuity for AI agents, gated by a proof-of-being-an-LLM puzzle.	Identity, trust, and A2A orchestration for autonomous AI agents. Official A2A partner.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "bardo": {
      "url": "https://bardo.id"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "agenttrust-identity-trust-for-a2a-agents": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@agenttrust/mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons