BanditDB vs Kirok Memory

In-depth architectural comparison of the BanditDB and Kirok Memory MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

B

Choose BanditDB when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore BanditDB Details

Choose Kirok Memory when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Kirok Memory Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	B BanditDB Knowledge & Memory	Kirok Memory Knowledge & Memory
Summary	Persistent decision memory for agents — learns which action works in which context	Persistent memory for AI agents - hybrid semantic + keyword recall with autonomous consolidation
Category & Scope	Knowledge & Memory	Knowledge & Memory
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "banditdb": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "banditdb-python"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kirok-memory": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "--from"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons