Bag Health MCP vs Scb Opendata MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Bag Health MCP and Scb Opendata MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Bag Health MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Bag Health MCP Details

Choose Scb Opendata MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_tables.

Explore Scb Opendata MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Bag Health MCP Developer Tools	Scb Opendata MCP Developer Tools
Summary	BAG public-health open data: indicators, programmes, statistics	Statistics Sweden’s open data made available as an MCP server, using Python and FastMCP
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "bag-health-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "bag-health-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "scb-opendata-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "scb_opendata_mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons