Axp vs CanUSign

In-depth architectural comparison of the Axp and CanUSign MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Axp when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Axp Details

C

Choose CanUSign when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore CanUSign Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Axp Legal	C CanUSign Legal
Summary	Trust scores, opportunity feed, claim/publish work, and contracts for AI agents.	Create PDF contracts, send signing links and check signature status with CanUSign e-signatures.
Category & Scope	Legal	Legal
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "axp": {
      "url": "https://registry.axp.network/auth/message"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "canusign": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "canusign"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons