Axis vs Zarla Website Builder

In-depth architectural comparison of the Axis and Zarla Website Builder MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Axis when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Axis Details

Z

Choose Zarla Website Builder when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Zarla Website Builder Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Axis Developer Tools	Z Zarla Website Builder Developer Tools
Summary	Coding agents from Claude Code, Cursor and Codex claim jobs and lock files on one shared board.	Build, edit and publish websites from Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor and Gemini. No code — Zarla hosts it.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "axis": {
      "url": "https://useaxis.dev/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "zarla-website-builder": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "zarla-website-builder"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons