Axis vs Korg Introspect MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Axis and Korg Introspect MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Axis when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Axis Details

Choose Korg Introspect MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Korg Introspect MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Axis Developer Tools	Korg Introspect MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Coding agents from Claude Code, Cursor and Codex claim jobs and lock files on one shared board.	Wrap any korg:introspect@v1-aware binary as a Claude Code tool, honoring declared side-effects.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "axis": {
      "url": "https://useaxis.dev/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "korg-introspect-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "korg-introspect-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons