Avalanche vs Map

In-depth architectural comparison of the Avalanche and Map MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Avalanche when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Avalanche Details

Choose Map when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Map Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Avalanche Developer Tools	Map Developer Tools
Summary	Act on Avalanche from your agent: scaffold a dapp, deploy a contract, mint, and read chain state.	One MCP for agent commerce: read · pay · publish. Teacher, not butler.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "avalanche": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@avakit/studio"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "map": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@maraventano/map"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons