What is the key difference between Auxen and Inflow?

Auxen belongs to the Developer Tools category with cloud HTTP/SSE execution, while Inflow belongs to the Developer Tools category with local stdio execution.

How do I install Auxen or Inflow in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Auxen and Inflow free or paid?

Auxen operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Inflow operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Auxen lists 6 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars. Inflow lists 0 tools with 0 views and 6 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Auxen and Inflow together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

How do I install Auxen or Inflow in Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Windsurf?

Both servers follow the standard Model Context Protocol configuration format. Simply copy the JSON block from the configuration section above and paste it into your AI client's mcpServers configuration object (for instance in claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json ), then completely restart or refresh the application.

Are Auxen and Inflow free to use, or do they require API keys?

Auxen is listed under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . Inflow operates under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . If environment variables are required (such as API keys), be sure to define them under the env key in your MCP client's configuration file.

Can I run both Auxen and Inflow at the same time in my AI client?

Yes! MCP clients support multi-server orchestration. You can include both auxen-2 and inflow-2 as distinct keys inside the single mcpServers object in your configuration file. Your AI assistant will automatically select and call the appropriate tool from either server during chat sessions.

Which MCP server has higher directory engagement and quality ratings?

On AllMCPs, Auxen has a Quality Score of 49 /100 ( Fair ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 0 GitHub stars. Inflow holds a Quality Score of 37 /100 ( Fair ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 6 GitHub stars.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Auxen vs Inflow

In-depth architectural comparison of the Auxen and Inflow MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Auxen

Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE

Quality: 49/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Inflow

Developer Tools · Local stdio

Quality: 37/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Auxen if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Inflow if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Auxen when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Primary tools included: auxen_list_models, auxen_get_instance_status, auxen_list_instances.

Explore Auxen Details

Choose Inflow when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Inflow Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	A Auxen Developer Tools	I Inflow Developer Tools
Summary	Provision private AI model endpoints on dedicated GPUs (Llama, Qwen, Mistral). Pay per minute.	MCP Server for agents to onboard, pay, and provision services autonomously with InFlow
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Auxen Tools (6)

auxen_list_models

read-only

auxen_get_instance_status

read-only

auxen_list_instances

read-only

auxen_get_balance

read-only

auxen_provision_model

destructive

auxen_destroy_instance

destructive

Inflow Tools (0)

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Auxen Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "auxen-2": {
      "url": "https://api.auxen.ai/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Inflow Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "inflow-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-remote"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Auxen is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, Inflow belongs to Developer Tools using local stdio subprocess. Select Auxen when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Inflow when you require tools for developer tools.

More alternatives to Auxen More alternatives to Inflow Developer Tools category hub

Related MCP Server Comparisons

Popular comparisons with Auxen

Popular comparisons with Inflow

M
Inflow vs Mcp