AutoTS vs Curagent Title Risk

In-depth architectural comparison of the AutoTS and Curagent Title Risk MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

A

Choose AutoTS when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore AutoTS Details

Choose Curagent Title Risk when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Curagent Title Risk Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	A AutoTS Developer Tools	Curagent Title Risk Developer Tools
Summary	Automated time series forecasting with model search, anomaly detection, and event risk analysis	AI title risk analysis for Florida real estate closing documents.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "autots": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "autots"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "curagent-title-risk": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "curagent-title-risk"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons