Autonomy x402 Tools vs X402 MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Autonomy x402 Tools and X402 MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

A

Choose Autonomy x402 Tools when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Autonomy x402 Tools Details

Choose X402 MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore X402 MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	A Autonomy x402 Tools Finance & Fintech	X402 MCP Finance & Fintech
Summary	Pay-per-call agent tools over x402: site audits, llms.txt generation, wallet watch, catalog.	177 crypto market intel endpoints with auto x402 USDC micropayments from your AI agent
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "autonomy-x402-tools": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "autonomy-x402-tools"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "x402-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@carbon-cashmere/x402-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons