Seo Performance MCP vs GEO MCP
A side-by-side look at the Seo Performance MCP and GEO MCP MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose Seo Performance MCP for marketing work as a local process; choose GEO MCP for marketing over a hosted endpoint. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
Choose Seo Performance MCP when
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
- You prefer a local stdio subprocess transport.
- Its auth model fits you: No auth required.
- You want tools like
posts_list, posts_snapshot, posts_decay_curve.
Choose GEO MCP when
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
- You prefer a remote HTTP/SSE transport.
Feature & specification comparison
Rows where the two servers differ are marked.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Marketing | Marketing |
| Quality signal | 60/100 · Good | 48/100 · Fair |
| Install command | Confirmed | Confirmed |
| Transport | Local subprocess (stdio) | Remote HTTP/SSE |
| Auth | No auth required | Not declared |
| Pricing | Free | Not declared |
| Required env vars | None listed | None listed |
| Verified owner | Community listing | Community listing |
| GitHub stars | 3 | 5,361 |
| Directory activity | 4 views 0 installs 0 upvotes | 1 views 0 installs 0 upvotes |
| Tools | 9 | Not listed |
| Full listing | View Seo Performance MCP | View GEO MCP |
Tools & capabilities
Seo Performance MCP tools 9
posts_listDiscover posts via an XML sitemap (POSTS_SITEMAP_URL or the sitemap_url arg), a JSON override list (POSTS_LIST), or - if configured - the Ghost Admin API. Pass an explicit urls[] to skip discovery entirely. Returns metadata: url, title, published_at, age_days, tags. Filter by minimum age or published-after date. When to use: discover which URLs are eligible for snapshot / verdict / cohort analysis. Works with any CMS that exposes a sitemap.posts_snapshotPull a 30/60/90-day snapshot across every configured signal source for one post: GSC clicks/impressions/CTR/position + top queries, Matomo visits + dwell, GA4 pageviews, Clarity scroll/rage clicks, AI-citation counts. Each source is best-effort: if its env vars are missing the field is omitted. Returns whatever is available. Read-only. No third-party writes. Optionally persists to the local DuckDB cache when persist=true.posts_decay_curveBucket GSC clicks/impressions/avg-position into ~weekly windows for the last N weeks (default 12) and classify the trend: decay / plateau / growth. Underpins the verdict engine's decay rules. Read-only GSC query.posts_verdictRun the rule-based verdict engine on a single post: combine snapshot + decay curve and emit a verdict with reason codes and a 0-1 confidence score. Reason codes are deterministic. The mapping reasons -> verdict lives in src/verdict/rules.ts and can be inspected. Reporting only - does NOT mutate anything. To act on the verdict, hand the brief to a writer or to an AI rewrite tool.posts_refresh_briefProduce a markdown brief for a human (or downstream LLM) editor: verdict + reasons + raw numbers + top queries + suggested actions. Use this as the hand-off artefact when verdict is refresh / expand / merge / double_down.cohort_reportRun the verdict engine across a cohort (filtered by tag and/or min-age) and return a ranked table sorted by verdict priority then confidence. Practical use: 'which three posts should I refresh this week?' - the top three rows with verdict=refresh and highest confidence are the answer.posts_cite_lossReturn the list of LLMs that previously cited this URL but no longer do, with the prior query and last-seen date. Optionally includes the URL that replaced ours. Requires a configured citation-intelligence MCP endpoint (CITATION_INTELLIGENCE_URL). Otherwise returns an empty list.gsc_quick_winsScan GSC for (page, query) pairs sitting in positions 5-15 with non-trivial impressions and a CTR below their position-expected curve. These are the fastest title-rewrite wins. Returns top results sorted by impressions desc. Pure GSC pull - platform-agnostic.bing_quick_winsScan Bing Webmaster Tools for queries sitting in positions 5-15 with non-trivial impressions. Bing's index backs Copilot, ChatGPT search, and Perplexity grounding, so a Bing rank gap is an LLM-citation gap. Query-level only: Bing has no single page+query API, so - unlike gsc_quick_wins, which returns (page, query) pairs - these carry no url. Sorted by impressions desc. Requires BING_WEBMASTER_API_KEY (Bing Webmaster Tools -> Settings -> API Access). Best-effort: returns config_missing if unset.
GEO MCP tools
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
Seo Performance MCP
{
"mcpServers": {
"automatelab-tech-seo-performance-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@automatelab/seo-performance-mcp"
]
}
}
}
GEO MCP
{
"mcpServers": {
"google-ads-meta-ads-seo-geo-mcp": {
"url": "https://connector.get-ryze.ai/mcp"
}
}
}
Frequently asked questions
Seo Performance MCP is categorized under Marketing and uses a local stdio subprocess. GEO MCP belongs to Marketing and uses a remote HTTP/SSE transport. Pick Seo Performance MCP for marketing work and GEO MCP for marketing.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.
Seo Performance MCP is listed as free. Auth: no auth required. GEO MCP has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add automatelab-tech-seo-performance-mcp and google-ads-meta-ads-seo-geo-mcp as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, Seo Performance MCP has a quality signal of 60/100 (Good) with 4 views, 0 installs and 3 GitHub stars. GEO MCP has 48/100 (Fair) with 1 views, 0 installs and 5,361 GitHub stars.