MCP Server Playwright vs MCP Browser Agent

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Server Playwright and MCP Browser Agent MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MCP Server Playwright when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: browser_navigate, browser_screenshot, browser_click.

Explore MCP Server Playwright Details

Choose MCP Browser Agent when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• You have access to required keys: MCP_BROWSER_TYPE.
• Primary tools included: browser_navigate, browser_screenshot, browser_click.

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	MCP Server Playwright automatalabs Browser Automation	MCP Browser Agent imprvhub Browser Automation
Summary
Category & Scope	Browser Automation	Browser Automation

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "automatalabs-mcp-server-playwright": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "automatalabs-mcp-server-playwright"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "imprvhub-mcp-browser-agent": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "imprvhub-mcp-browser-agent"
      ],
      "env": {
        "MCP_BROWSER_TYPE": "YOUR_MCP_BROWSER_TYPE_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons