Ausca vs Ead Factory

In-depth architectural comparison of the Ausca and Ead Factory MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Ausca when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Ausca Details

Choose Ead Factory when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Ead Factory Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Ausca Developer Tools	Ead Factory Developer Tools
Summary	Pay-per-call APIs and MCP services for agents, no accounts or keys, with verifiable receipts.	EAD Factory MCP — Digital Trust services APIs for your agents
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ausca-4": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "ausca"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ead-factory-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@g-digital/mcp-ead-factory"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons