What is the key difference between Aura and Domani?

Aura belongs to the Communication category with local stdio execution, while Domani belongs to the Communication category with local stdio execution.

How do I install Aura or Domani in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Aura and Domani free or paid?

Aura operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Domani operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Aura lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars. Domani lists 0 tools with 0 views and 1 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Aura and Domani together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Aura vs Domani

In-depth architectural comparison of the Aura and Domani MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Aura

Communication · Local stdio

Quality: 40/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Domani

Communication · Local stdio

Quality: 44/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Aura if you need specialized Communication tools running via a local process. Choose Domani if your workspace requires Communication integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Aura when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Aura Details

Choose Domani when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Domani Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Aura Communication	D Domani Communication
Summary	Email address, webhook, durable memory and zero-token waiting for agents. Paid in USDC via x402.	Domains + send/receive email + inbound webhooks + DNS for AI agents. One API, MCP, CLI.
Category & Scope	Communication	Communication
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Aura Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Domani Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Aura Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "aura-2": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "aura-x402"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Domani Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "domani": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Aura is categorized under Communication and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Domani belongs to Communication using local stdio subprocess. Select Aura when you need capabilities focused on communication and Domani when you require tools for communication.

More alternatives to Aura More alternatives to Domani Communication category hub