Audio Analyzer vs Notch

In-depth architectural comparison of the Audio Analyzer and Notch MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Audio Analyzer when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Multimedia Process domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: audio_info, spectral_features, harmonic_analysis.

Explore Audio Analyzer Details

N

Choose Notch when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Multimedia Process domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Accepts product pages as source material, Uses creative briefs as input, Produces video ads.

Explore Notch Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Audio Analyzer Multimedia Process	N Notch Multimedia Process
Summary	Gives LLMs ears. Spectral, harmonic, rhythm, stereo, and structural audio analysis.	Turn product pages and creative briefs into finished video and image ads from your AI chat.
Category & Scope	Multimedia Process	Multimedia Process
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "audio-analyzer": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "audio-analyzer"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "notch": {
      "url": "https://app.usenotch.ai/mcp/setup"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons