What is the key difference between Attestix and Security Recipes?

Attestix belongs to the Security category with local stdio execution, while Security Recipes belongs to the Security category with local stdio execution.

How do I install Attestix or Security Recipes in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Attestix and Security Recipes free or paid?

Attestix operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Security Recipes operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Attestix lists 0 tools with 2 views and 17 GitHub stars. Security Recipes lists 0 tools with 0 views and 1 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Attestix and Security Recipes together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Attestix vs Security Recipes

In-depth architectural comparison of the Attestix and Security Recipes MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Attestix

Security · Local stdio

Quality: 44/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Security Recipes

Security · Local stdio

Quality: 33/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Attestix if you need specialized Security tools running via a local process. Choose Security Recipes if your workspace requires Security integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Attestix when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Attestix Details

Choose Security Recipes when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Security Recipes Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Attestix Security	S Security Recipes Security
Summary	AI agent identity, W3C credentials, EU AI Act compliance. 47 MCP tools.	Read-only CVE intelligence, remediation playbooks, and agent setup guides. Not a scanner.
Category & Scope	Security	Security
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Attestix Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Security Recipes Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Attestix Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "attestix": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "attestix"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Security Recipes Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "security-recipes": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "security-recipes"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Attestix is categorized under Security and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Security Recipes belongs to Security using local stdio subprocess. Select Attestix when you need capabilities focused on security and Security Recipes when you require tools for security.

More alternatives to Attestix More alternatives to Security Recipes Security category hub