Attestix vs Vibgrate MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Attestix and Vibgrate MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Attestix when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Attestix Details

V

Choose Vibgrate MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Vibgrate MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Attestix Security	V Vibgrate MCP Security
Summary	AI agent identity, W3C credentials, EU AI Act compliance. 47 MCP tools.	Query your team's drift, vulnerability, and upgrade data from any AI assistant. OAuth 2.1, 51 tools.
Category & Scope	Security	Security
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "attestix": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "attestix"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-157": {
      "url": "https://vibgrate.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons