Ato MCP vs Dify MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Ato MCP and Dify MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Ato MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Ato MCP Details

D

Choose Dify MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_datasets, get_dataset, search_knowledge.

Explore Dify MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Ato MCP Developer Tools	D Dify MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Australian tax knowledge base: cited retrieval over ATO guidance, the ITAA & GST Acts, and rulings.	MCP server exposing Dify knowledge base retrieval to Cursor and other MCP clients
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ato-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "works"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "dify-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "dify-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons