Atlassian Attachments vs Zephyr Scale MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Atlassian Attachments and Zephyr Scale MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Atlassian Attachments when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Workplace & Productivity domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: download_jira_attachment, upload_jira_attachment, get_jira_attachment_reference.

Explore Atlassian Attachments Details

Choose Zephyr Scale MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Workplace & Productivity domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Zephyr Scale MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Atlassian Attachments Workplace & Productivity	Zephyr Scale MCP Workplace & Productivity
Summary	MCP server for downloading Jira and Confluence Cloud attachments by attachment ID.	Zephyr Scale on self-hosted Jira Server/DC: test cases, cycles, executions, plans and attachments
Category & Scope	Workplace & Productivity	Workplace & Productivity

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "atlassian-attachments": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/inspector"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "zephyr-scale-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "zephyr-scale-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons