Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Atlas Red mind maps vs Coret.id
In-depth architectural comparison of the Atlas Red mind maps and Coret.id MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Atlas Red mind maps
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 25/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Coret.id
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 37/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Atlas Red mind maps if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Coret.id if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
A
Choose Atlas Red mind maps when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
C
Choose Coret.id when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Atlas Red mind maps Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Coret.id Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Atlas Red mind maps Configuration
Coret.id Configuration